Re: Oracle 10g and JVM

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:05:12 +0200, "Matthias Hoys" <idmwarpzone_NOSPAM__at_yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>No real problem actually - I always try to install the minimal amount of
>features/options/modules that we really need - this consumes less resources
>(memory, diskspace), takes less time to patch, and what doesn't get
>installed, can't get broken. I know that Oracle recommends to install JVM,
>Intermedia, and XML db (they are selected by default).
>So my question is what are the consequences of not installing JVM ?

It is quite clear database and jvm are more and more getting interrelated. Not installing the JVM has nothing to do with 'installing the minimal amount ... that we really need', as more and more features rely on the presence of the JVM (even a new feature like catpatch), not installing the JVM is just plain stupid.

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA