Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

From: Daniel Morgan <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:29:06 GMT
Message-ID: <3DA49171.A392D5D8@exesolutions.com>

Pete Sharman wrote:

> In article <3DA33539.95C176B0_at_exesolutions.com>, Daniel says...
> >
> >Norman Dunbar wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Howard J. Rogers [mailto:howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au]
> >> Posted At: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:38 AM
> >> Posted To: server
> >> Conversation: Oracle Doc Mixup?
> >> Subject: Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?
> >>
> >> >> Do you really want it (stands back, waiting for the deluge)?
> >> Well, from a purly financial point of view it would be useful - I might
> >> get more money for doing the same job :o)
> >> For practical use - it makes no difference to me, but hey, the
> >> certificate looks nice, I get another set of tie pins and a third
> >> subscription to Oracle magazine (of which, hardly any ever get delivered
> >> !)
> >>
> >> >> Seriously: thank you. I knew it was there somewhere. It certainly got
> >> >> garbled in the translation (from flea to serious stuff) but we got
> >> there in
> >> >> the end.
> >> Welcome.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Norman.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------
> >> Norman Dunbar
> >> Database/Unix administrator
> >> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
> >> mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
> >> Tel: 0113 289 6265
> >> Fax: 0113 289 3146
> >> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
> >> -------------------------------------
> >
> >Thank you everyone.
> >
> >And, presumably, Peter has sent a message to someone telling them exactly
> >how much we value invalid documentation.
> >
> >Daniel Morgan
> >

>

> It is indeed logged as a doc bug (bug# 2617434 if you're interested).

>

> HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.

>

> Pete

>
> SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements;

Thank you kind sir.

Daniel Morgan Received on Wed Oct 09 2002 - 15:29:06 CDT