Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?

In article <3DA33539.95C176B0_at_exesolutions.com>, Daniel says...
>
>Norman Dunbar wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Howard J. Rogers [mailto:howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au]
>> Posted At: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:38 AM
>> Posted To: server
>> Conversation: Oracle Doc Mixup?
>> Subject: Re: Oracle Doc Mixup?
>>
>> >> Do you really want it (stands back, waiting for the deluge)?
>> Well, from a purly financial point of view it would be useful - I might
>> get more money for doing the same job :o)
>> For practical use - it makes no difference to me, but hey, the
>> certificate looks nice, I get another set of tie pins and a third
>> subscription to Oracle magazine (of which, hardly any ever get delivered
>> !)
>>
>> >> Seriously: thank you. I knew it was there somewhere. It certainly got
>> >> garbled in the translation (from flea to serious stuff) but we got
>> there in
>> >> the end.
>> Welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Norman.
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>> Norman Dunbar
>> Database/Unix administrator
>> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
>> mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
>> Tel: 0113 289 6265
>> Fax: 0113 289 3146
>> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
>> -------------------------------------
>
>Thank you everyone.
>
>And, presumably, Peter has sent a message to someone telling them exactly
>how much we value invalid documentation.
>
>Daniel Morgan
>

It is indeed logged as a doc bug (bug# 2617434 if you're interested).

HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete

SELECT standard_disclaimer, witty_remark FROM company_requirements; Received on Tue Oct 08 2002 - 17:52:37 CDT