Re: Which one is better? Oracel 9i or DB2 7.2??

I was under the impression that the original poster already had made up his mind to buy either Oracle or DB2. If the difference in quality and features are so large to motivate a comparison between a high performance car and a Yugo...well, it was your words...

For all I know, why don't we throw in Massey-Ferguson in the list of products that must be supported too? Your selection of Yugo must mean the required minimum average speed was less than 30 km per hour, and I think a MF could support that... :-)

Making sure you system can be supported by at least two vendors does not automatically mean it must run on every database system out there.

In article <OdLz8.30648$ao1.9149_at_rwcrnsc54>, "Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com> wrote:
>I disagree. If you are going to buy a database use what you paid for. My
>first inclination would be to go with something I know well and not with
>something you don't know well. If you are familiar with choice X and have
>staff who are also familiar with choice X and choice X will do the job then
>I would be hard pressed to make a different choice. It would have to be
>something very overwhelming and I would want it proven to make a different
>choice. The comfort level that my developers have and familiarities with
>the strengths and weaknesses are much more important than dragging the
>respective companies marketing types into it. The marketing types are
>usually NOT technical and don't do any day to day development. If you want
>a free lunch then maybe invite them in. :-) But to buy an expensive
>database and make the decision not to use its features to the benefit of
>your business is like buying a high performance car and driving it like a
>Yugo - just so you don't relief on a feature some other car doesn't
>have.(Yugo being lowest common denominator)
>
>Jim
>
>
>"Robert Sundström" <robert.sundstrom_at_upright.se> wrote in message
>news:aam9lg$b6d$1_at_yggdrasil.utfors.se...
>> In article <3CCD6A14.6090206_at_netcape.net>, KPNG <japang_at_netcape.net>
>wrote:
>> >Hi All,
>> >
>> >I'm comparing these two brand database server for our new trading system.
>> >
>> >I know that both of them are famous and occupied large market share. But
>> >can some tell me, or has link to the research document which can compare
>> >these two products objectively.
>>
>> I believe the most important design choice/decision when implementing your
>> system is to make sure your trading system will only use standardized
>features
>> provided by both vendors, and possibly other brands as well. If you are
>able
>> to do this, the choice of database vendor will be less important for your
>> business. Since it will be easier for you to migrate to another brand
>sometime
>> in he future, you will be less dependent on those suit-and-tie-equipped
>sales
>> drones who in a few years inevitably will try to have you pay higher
>support
>> fees.
>> -
>> Robert Sundström, Mimer SQL Development
>> Upright Database Technology AB, http://www.mimer.com
Received on Thu May 02 2002 - 06:57:09 CDT