Re: Oracle 8 on NT

sounds good but no telnet, cron or vi, i can't stand it :-)

On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Daniel wrote:

> We're not having any problems with remote admin. We use PC Anywhere and I
> can do anything remote that I can standing in front of the server. Uptime
> is good. We schedule our patches/reboots (< 10 minutes) and everything
> works fine.
>
> Daniel
> Austin, TX
>
> <jcollins_at_sasquatch.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.21.0001120943310.13703-100000_at_seashell.sasquatch.com...
> > as much as i loath nt, i have to say that the uptime on our oracle/nt
> database has been 100% (knock-wood) this last year.
> >
> > but....it isn't just uptime. nt sucks royally for remote admin, you can't
> do anything to the box because it requires a reboot and automation (even
> with mks toolkit) is bad. we are upgrading out production db to sun.
> >
> > good luck.
> >
> > On 10 Jan 2000, goofnut wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I am trying to find if anyone has any experience dealing with Oracle 8
> running
> > > on Windows NT. I would like to know how reliable it is when there are
> about
> > > 200 user connections and hot backups being done every night.We need to
> have an
> > > uptime of at least 99.985% and I was wondering if it is even possible
> with
> > > Oracle running on NT.
> > >
> > > Please email your comments to gan_lawrence_at_prc.com.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jan 13 2000 - 11:56:11 CST