Re: Oracle 8 on NT

Let's see...
AT works in place of CRON.... Not as featured but gets the job done... I don't need TELNET or vi because I have the GUI and its nice, friendly applications...
Why would I go back to command line...

Daniel
Austin, TX

<jcollins_at_sasquatch.com> wrote in message news:Pine.NEB.4.21.0001130955200.29713-100000_at_seashell.sasquatch.com...
> sounds good but no telnet, cron or vi, i can't stand it :-)
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Daniel wrote:
>
> > We're not having any problems with remote admin. We use PC Anywhere and
I
> > can do anything remote that I can standing in front of the server.
Uptime
> > is good. We schedule our patches/reboots (< 10 minutes) and everything
> > works fine.
> >
> > Daniel
> > Austin, TX
> >
> > <jcollins_at_sasquatch.com> wrote in message
> > news:Pine.NEB.4.21.0001120943310.13703-100000_at_seashell.sasquatch.com...
> > > as much as i loath nt, i have to say that the uptime on our oracle/nt
> > database has been 100% (knock-wood) this last year.
> > >
> > > but....it isn't just uptime. nt sucks royally for remote admin, you
can't
> > do anything to the box because it requires a reboot and automation (even
> > with mks toolkit) is bad. we are upgrading out production db to sun.
> > >
> > > good luck.
> > >
> > > On 10 Jan 2000, goofnut wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to find if anyone has any experience dealing with Oracle
8
> > running
> > > > on Windows NT. I would like to know how reliable it is when there
are
> > about
> > > > 200 user connections and hot backups being done every night.We need
to
> > have an
> > > > uptime of at least 99.985% and I was wondering if it is even
possible
> > with
> > > > Oracle running on NT.
> > > >
> > > > Please email your comments to gan_lawrence_at_prc.com.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Thu Jan 13 2000 - 14:01:09 CST