Re: Huge problem with COM+ performace? PART TWO

Hi.

If what you said about awaiting of object is true then I'd try to create an empty object with ATL that match your object's settings and see if the story continues.
Simply put I do not trust VB when it cames to distributed computing.

Alexander

"Adam Boczek" <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de> wrote in message news:1004619750.690528_at_tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de...
> I have tried both OLEDB Providers (Oracle and Microsoft) :-(.
>
> As I said earlier, I have locks not on database. My clients wait sometimes
> up to 3 min (!) to receive an object (CreateObject method)...
>
> Greets,
> Adam
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Adam Boczek
> IT Consultant
> GFT Solutions GmbH
> adam.boczek_at_gft-solutions.de
> -------------------------------------------
>
> "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag news:3be14250$0$8511$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> > I guess the only otrher question I have is what technology you are using
> to
> > access the database.
> >
> > I know that there is a choice of ms and oracle ole-db providers and
Oracle
> > also provides oo40, but I'm not sure if this can be hosted within MTS.
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > Audit Commission Uk
> >
> >
> > "Adam Boczek" <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de> wrote in message
> > news:1004609137.187138_at_tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de...
> > > Thanx for hint but I have tried all possibilities (BTW CreateInstance
> has
> > to
> > > be used with "old" MTS).
> > >
> > > Greets,
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > > Adam Boczek
> > > IT Consultant
> > > GFT Solutions GmbH
> > > adam.boczek_at_gft-solutions.de
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> schrieb im
> > > Newsbeitrag news:3be11c89$0$8512$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> > > > "Adam Boczek" <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de> wrote in
message
> > > > news:1004553339.429437_at_tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de...
> > > > > First of all I'd like to thanx all of you for answers!
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > Suddenly I've found in log event, that my second client can't
> > initialize
> > > > > com+ object (stops when I call "set a = new MyDll.Function"). When
> the
> > > > first
> > > > > client realises or creates new object than some resouces are free
> and
> > > > second
> > > > > client goes on, but stops when it once again needs new object. So
it
> > > looks
> > > > > like problems by resource pooling in com+.
> > > >
> > > > Try replacing
> > > >
> > > > set a = New MYDLL.....
> > > >
> > > > with
> > > >
> > > > set a = CreateObject("mydll class string")
> > > >
> > > > I believe there was also a reference to a call to
> > createinstance(something
> > > > or other) but as you can tell I'm ot familiar with that syntax.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Niall Litchfield
> > > > Oracle DBA
> > > > Audit Commission Uk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 09:29:17 CST