Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Huge problem with COM+ performace? PART TWO

Re: Huge problem with COM+ performace? PART TWO

From: Adam Boczek <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 14:02:32 +0100
Message-ID: <1004619750.690528@tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de>


I have tried both OLEDB Providers (Oracle and Microsoft) :-(.

As I said earlier, I have locks not on database. My clients wait sometimes up to 3 min (!) to receive an object (CreateObject method)...

Greets,
Adam



Adam Boczek
IT Consultant
GFT Solutions GmbH
adam.boczek_at_gft-solutions.de

"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:3be14250$0$8511$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> I guess the only otrher question I have is what technology you are using
to
> access the database.
>
> I know that there is a choice of ms and oracle ole-db providers and Oracle
> also provides oo40, but I'm not sure if this can be hosted within MTS.
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission Uk
>
>
> "Adam Boczek" <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de> wrote in message
> news:1004609137.187138_at_tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de...
> > Thanx for hint but I have tried all possibilities (BTW CreateInstance
has
> to
> > be used with "old" MTS).
> >
> > Greets,
> > Adam
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Adam Boczek
> > IT Consultant
> > GFT Solutions GmbH
> > adam.boczek_at_gft-solutions.de
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> schrieb im
> > Newsbeitrag news:3be11c89$0$8512$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> > > "Adam Boczek" <adam.boczek_at_NO_SPAM_gft-solutions.de> wrote in message
> > > news:1004553339.429437_at_tux2.ham.acs-gmbh.de...
> > > > First of all I'd like to thanx all of you for answers!
> > > <snip>
> > > > Suddenly I've found in log event, that my second client can't
> initialize
> > > > com+ object (stops when I call "set a = new MyDll.Function"). When
the
> > > first
> > > > client realises or creates new object than some resouces are free
and
> > > second
> > > > client goes on, but stops when it once again needs new object. So it
> > looks
> > > > like problems by resource pooling in com+.
> > >
> > > Try replacing
> > >
> > > set a = New MYDLL.....
> > >
> > > with
> > >
> > > set a = CreateObject("mydll class string")
> > >
> > > I believe there was also a reference to a call to
> createinstance(something
> > > or other) but as you can tell I'm ot familiar with that syntax.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Niall Litchfield
> > > Oracle DBA
> > > Audit Commission Uk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 07:02:32 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US