OT: the natural philosopher misses the point

From: J.O. Aho <user_at_example.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:40:10 +0100
Message-ID: <egqj3qFkpklU1_at_mid.individual.net>

[Quoted] On 02/18/17 09:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 17/02/17 18:49, J.O. Aho wrote:

[Quoted] >> On 02/17/17 07:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>>  A staggering example of the right answer to an entirely different
>>> question????
>>
>> And your contributions value? 0?
>>

> No. My contribution is to point out that the supplied solution was of
> zero value to the poster, since it was not an answer to the question he
> posed.
>
> I.e. it was a contribution of zero value.
>
>
It was a reply to his follow up question, but I guess you missed that Received on Sat Feb 18 2017 - 10:40:10 CET