Re: OT: the natural philosopher misses the point

From: Axel Schwenke <axel.schwenke_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:23:58 +0100
Message-ID: <o89e9f$op0$1_at_dont-email.me>

[Quoted] On 18.02.2017 10:40, J.O. Aho wrote:

> On 02/18/17 09:39, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

>> On 17/02/17 18:49, J.O. Aho wrote:
>>> On 02/17/17 07:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>>> A staggering example of the right answer to an entirely different
>>>> question????
>>>
>> My contribution is to point out that the supplied solution was of
>> zero value to the poster, since it was not an answer to the question he
>> posed.
>>
> It was a reply to his follow up question, but I guess you missed that

[Quoted] I never dreamed that some day I would defend TNP, but he is at least partly right: the OP removed anything in his quote about *what* he wanted help with. So TNP (and anybody else who didn't follow the thread from the start) would resort to the thread topic. And then notice that the answer has nothing to do with the topic.

Actually the whole thread has nothing to do with the topic. The OP seems to be very stupid (he has proven that in previous threads too). For that reason I didn't waste any time with answering him.

For the reference - here is the full thread:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.databases.mysql/tztl0JJFrGg Received on Sat Feb 18 2017 - 13:23:58 CET