Re: Overhead of Dataguard

From: Stefan Koehler <contact_at_soocs.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:57:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1100881766.139826.1510649852303_at_ox.hosteurope.de>


Hey Jack,
you may want to have a look at this white paper: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/availability/maa-wp-10gr2-dataguardnetworkbestpr-134557.pdf

It is about Oracle 10g and there have some enhancements in the meantime but it includes impact analysis / results.

Best Regards
Stefan Koehler

Independent Oracle performance consultant and researcher Website: http://www.soocs.de
Twitter: _at_OracleSK

> Jack van Zanen <jack_at_vanzanen.com> hat am 14. November 2017 um 04:21 geschrieben:
>
> Hi All
>
> I was wondering if anyone had done any testing on the overhead of Dataguard on the primary system?
>
> We would like to setup dataguard for one of our systems and the business can most likely not accept a performance degredation of the nightly batch job.
>
> Now I understand that we have to turn on force logging and depending on the amount of nologging that is happening in the batch this could be a considerable overhead, I am just wondering besides this what the impacts are in maximum performance and maximum availability and maximum protection mode. I can turn on force logging without having to set up dataguard.
>
> Let's assume for now that the network can keep up with the changes.....
>
> Jack van Zanen

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Nov 14 2017 - 09:57:31 CET

Original text of this message