Re: NetApp All Flash

Thanks! Yeah I was expecting the CPU to increase now which has me a little concerned though. Currently we only have a 4 core box and using around 40% on average.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stefan Koehler <contact_at_soocs.de> wrote:

> Hey Jeff,
> i recently did an I/O performance benchmark (SLOB) for a large enterprise
> who bought a NetApp All Flash storage as well.
>
> The results were very convincing even with a very high amount of (parallel
> non-contention) SLOB sessions. We hit the host limits (e.g. FC) before the
> storage was struggling at all. I did benchmarks for single & multi-block
> I/O and redo.
>
> Just be aware that you probably eliminate I/O waiting states with All
> Flash storage and so your CPU usage on database server can increase as the
> Oracle code can process data without waiting too long on I/Os.
>
> Best Regards
> Stefan Koehler
>
> Freelance Oracle performance consultant and researcher
> Homepage: http://www.soocs.de
> Twitter: _at_OracleSK
>
> > Jeff Chirco <backseatdba_at_gmail.com> hat am 1. August 2016 um 17:59
> geschrieben:
> >
> > Anyone have experience running Oracle on NetApp All Flash storage?
> Anything good or bad to say? Our storage team recently purchased AFF 8040
> and
> > I'm trying to do some research. We currently already have a NetApp san
> just not an all flash one. So I am familiar with there SMO software, just
> > wondering if there is anything to know about running Oracle on there or
> in general about all flash storage and databases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l