Re: OT Discussion- Priority of Performance Tuning...
From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw_at_centrexcc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:19:31 -0600
Message-Id: <EC0375BF-A48A-4FA0-9C45-41603E78ACEA_at_centrexcc.com>
I think this thread started because I took exception to the comment "priorities for the business may not be the same as a priority for the DBA’s". IMO they should be the same, i.e. the DBA should not make something a priority if it is not a priority for the business, has their backing. The only exception to that rule is when it comes to backups. That must be a priority for the DBA even if the business does not understand the priority of it - although they need to be reminded of it at every opportunity. With backups the priority would become obvious to the business only when it is too late. I'm curious about the opinions on that. Not the last bit about backups. I hope we do not have any disagreement there.
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:19:31 -0600
Message-Id: <EC0375BF-A48A-4FA0-9C45-41603E78ACEA_at_centrexcc.com>
I think this thread started because I took exception to the comment "priorities for the business may not be the same as a priority for the DBA’s". IMO they should be the same, i.e. the DBA should not make something a priority if it is not a priority for the business, has their backing. The only exception to that rule is when it comes to backups. That must be a priority for the DBA even if the business does not understand the priority of it - although they need to be reminded of it at every opportunity. With backups the priority would become obvious to the business only when it is too late. I'm curious about the opinions on that. Not the last bit about backups. I hope we do not have any disagreement there.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Oct 26 2011 - 16:19:31 CDT