Re: Applying CPU to RAC with physical standby
From: S. Anthony Sequeira <tony_at_sequeira.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:16:28 +0100
Message-Id: <1211976988.9251.18.camel@quasar.sequestor.lan>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:16:28 +0100
Message-Id: <1211976988.9251.18.camel@quasar.sequestor.lan>
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 13:59 +0200, Carel-Jan Engel wrote:
> At least I would stronly encourage not to have the standby database
> receiving and/or applying logs whilst the primary is upgraded. Oracle
> docs suggest to do this.
Yes.
> However, what if the upgrade fails? Then you have two databases
> upgraded halfway.
> I never understood why Oracle wants this approach in a HA environment.
Rollback? :)
[...]
-- S. Anthony Sequeira ++ There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending. -- Abraham Lincoln, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.5 ++ -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed May 28 2008 - 07:16:28 CDT