RE: Case for Index Organized table?

From: Richard J. Goulet <rgoulet_at_kanbay.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:09 -0400
Message-ID: <C3EE2ADD31ACF64DAB1B236044A1968D730128@miaexc01.kanbay.com>

Ram,  

    None other than the shear stupidity of their request.  

........................................................................


............................................................. 

Kanbay <http://www.kanbay.com/>
Richard J. Goulet, Senior Oracle DBA
45 Bartlett ST | Marlborough, MA 01752 USA Tel: 508.573.1978 | Fax: 508.229.2019 | Cell: 508.742.5795

rgoulet_at_kanbay.com <mailto:rgoulet_at_kanbay.com> 
........................................................................


............................................................. 



 

________________________________

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ram Raman Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:12 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: Case for Index Organized table?

Hi all,    

I got a requirement from the developers to build a new table which has a column that will hold every second of every business day. That is the only column in the table. The table will be truncated everyday and loaded with the subsequent day's time. The developers told me that this table speeds up their queries, I also talked about using other ways but they said that they tested a few ways and found this one the best. They also want an index on that table. I am thinking of creating an index organized table for this purpose. Does anyone foresee any problem in this approach.    

Ram.  

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Apr 23 2007 - 14:58:09 CDT