RE: stdby and Oracle licensing

From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:48:45 +0100
Message-Id: <1138747725.4371.2.camel@dbalert199.dbalert.nl>

Mark refers to my post of June 21/25 last year: http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/06-2005/msg00954.html

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:33 -0800, David wrote:

> I'm referring to the standby piece specifically. I'm clear on failover
> and don't think that has changed.
> Has the standby agreement changed or have I just been clueless this long.
> I have even posed thi to ORacle sales last year and was told: "Standby is
> covered under EE and has no additional cost"
>
> Now, it costs additional EE licenses under the same model to cover both
> servers...
> Did'nt always used to be like that I'm quite sure.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jan 31 2006 - 16:48:45 CST