Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

From: Anand Rao <panandrao_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-12-29 10:21:40
Message-id: d70710370512290121l615737c5g@mail.gmail.com


You are joking....right?

anand

On 29/12/05, Maimon Oded wrote:
>
> i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the
> discussion to something else.
>
> NFS of CFS?
>
> On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson wrote:
>
> > sometimes man bites dog
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> > ] *On Behalf Of *rjamya
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
> > *To:* tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee
> > *Cc:* ORACLE-L
> > *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
> >
> >
> > We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them
> > whenever ... so that helps.
> >
> > Rjamya
> >
> > On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have
> > > had RAC
> > > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning
> > > extra
> > > (although discounted) price.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Received on Thu Dec 29 2005 - 10:21:40 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US