X-list: oracle-l Return-Path: Subject: Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC From: Anand Rao Message-id: d70710370512290121l615737c5g@mail.gmail.com Date: 2005-12-29 10:21:40 You are joking....right? anand On 29/12/05, Maimon Oded wrote: > > i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the > discussion to something else. > > NFS of CFS? > > On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson wrote: > > > sometimes man bites dog > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org > > ] *On Behalf Of *rjamya > > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM > > *To:* tanel.poder.003@mail.ee > > *Cc:* ORACLE-L > > *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC > > > > > > We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them > > whenever ... so that helps. > > > > Rjamya > > > > On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003@mail.ee> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have > > > had RAC > > > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning > > > extra > > > (although discounted) price. > > > > > > > > >