RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: 2005-12-28 18:28:10
Message-id: B9782AD410794F4687F2B5B4A6FF350103288CA3@ex1.ms.polyserve.com

	about the cost of RAC, you are right.
	I was looking on that as no cost at all because that in large IT

companies you have a site license for oracle (get every thing you wish from oracle) and the cost of oracle tools doesn't get in the cost calculation...

...I think you are the only human on earth that managed to get RAC included in site license cost. Everyone else I've ever heard of has had to "buy up".

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Dec 28 2005 - 18:28:10 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark W. Farnham: "RE: Split Blocks on Instance Crash, different issue for OS HW/SW failure in crash"
Previous message: David Sharples: "Re: did you notice that the 10.1 lin_x86 binaries mask username/password in the process table?"
Maybe in reply to: Antonio Belloni: "Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC"
Next in thread: Hameed, Amir: "RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US