Re: The anatomy of plagiarism that was made by authors of "Anchor Modeling"

Here are a few important comments, which are related to plagiarism of authors of "Anchor Modeling". These authors plagiarized my identifiers of states of relationships. These identifiers you can see in definition 16, see their paper submitted to Data & Knowledge Engineering, October, 2010. (it is their second ("fixed") paper) I would like once again to point out the method, how the plagiarism was done: The authors of "Anchor Modeling" plagiarized the "states" from my papers after I showed that their solutions from the papers from 2009 are erroneous and represent a deep lack of understanding of some basic things of database theory. This second plagiarism they have published in their paper from the 2010th

In the end, I'll just mention that the authors of "Anchor Modeling" does not define "states". This, what the authors of "Anchor Modeling" are doing, it really becomes grotesque. As I described in my previous post, states are of a fundamental character for several areas.

The definition of state is very complex. Just to mention that I did decomposition into binary structures, introduced facts and knowledge and the new data model that can maintain states. Note that I presented "states" in my paper from 2005. I have also presented the states, on this user group on September 2005, 10 years ago.

Vladimir Odrljin Received on Thu Mar 19 2015 - 04:56:20 CET