Re: Theory adrift: creative use of databases

From: Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <6677a175-b693-4c50-80de-268a2b869111_at_googlegroups.com>


How very very sad.

The TTM slaves can't find a real database to laugh at, so they manufacture, contrive, cook one up, so they have something to laugh at. It is so telling. If you can't find what you want, just dream up another dream.

They can't produce a even one single Key using either the normal Key Determination method, or their magical mystical Non-FD-fragment Key Determination method, over 38 attributes, all of which are given, in over two weeks. They can't tell the difference between base and derived relations, so they normalise both. They have RFS for "database". They can't create a single thing. But they sure can manufacture something that they dream creators create, in order to contrive a sense of superiority.

I love it.

The best part is this, their "database description" has six rectangles, each of a different size, each with just one word. That explains why they can't read data models, all those words and formatting in each box, all that diagrammatic notation. The boxes are then "described" using one thousand, one hundred, and twenty seven words. So let's get this right: they can't use 96% of their God-given brain power, and they overload the remaining 4%; they love their text strings.

They are clueless that we laugh, guffaw, at EVERYTHING they manufacture, contrive, cook up, dream. Like their Ds. And their As and Bs and Cs. ANd their 6 boxes plus 1,127 words.

Good laugh, good thread. Keep it up. Received on Thu Feb 19 2015 - 00:48:13 CET

Original text of this message