Re: SQL Bashing - the Sport of Champions!

I must have done something right, the sewers are seething, the maggots are squirming.

> On Thursday, 19 February 2015 01:01:15 UTC+11, Erwin wrote:

> "elaborations" by Mr. Pig Poop are not worth reading. They are biased by very questionable prejudices at best, hopelessly uninformed and outright wrong at worst.

The usual sniping, from under manhole covers, labels, generalisations, without evidence, without a single specific point. Never a direct attack, always an infection, an infestation, a contamination. Typical maggot, attached to the anus.

I suppose I should take it as a compliment, that you copy my expressions, and forget the fact that subhumans have no originality. Thank you.

> One example : Mr. Pig Poop wrote "The notion of the Heading being tightly coupled to the column is a TTM absurdity. Complete pig poop. It doesn't happen in SQL, so in any case, it is silly to expect the non-feature here." I invite you to read up on SQL's UNION CORRESPONDING to see the evidence of the contrary.

1. Your mother sow decries SQL. She cannot at the same comply with it, and expect to be taken seriously. Oh yeah, she contradicts herself all the time. She shouldn't ever be taken seriously.
2. The evidence will bury you. Most of us SELECT without UNION. So let's get this right: the fraud uses a marginal case, the only one where naming is used, to justify a "law". And even then, one has to supply the names, and thus one can supply any set of names.

Typical maggot permanently attached to the anus.

Thank you for proving that, both points. I love it.

Imbecile.

You need to take the phylactery off your forehead and shove it in your, um, er, mouth. Since you do everything backwards, as children of the devil do.

Eurhm is the sound a maggot makes when it is chock-full of pig poop, just before it explodes.

God bless
Derek Received on Wed Feb 18 2015 - 15:50:35 CET