Re: Fails Relational, Fails Third Normal Form
From: Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8d675124-2d4d-4f33-9226-1108457436f5_at_googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8d675124-2d4d-4f33-9226-1108457436f5_at_googlegroups.com>
Nicola
> On Monday, 9 February 2015 05:19:24 UTC+11, Derek Asirvadem wrote:
>
> If the answer to [1] is "yes", then please look at this page. At this stage, before I dive into determining the Keys, I would like to make sure that I have gotten the facts right.
> http://www.softwaregems.com.au/Documents/Article/Normalisation/DNF%20Data%20Model%20A.pdf
I missed one requirement, doc updated.
Also, in addition to my 'traditional' layout, I am experimenting (exploring?) a new one. I have given you both. Please indicate which one you prefer, not in terms of eye candy, but in terms of cognition; comprehension; logical structure of the data presented.
Cheers
Derek
Received on Sun Feb 08 2015 - 21:56:40 CET