Re: The Null Problem is a Non-issue

> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:30:39 UTC+11, Derek Asirvadem wrote:
>
> There are *many* *specific* reasons, not *one* as you speculate, for the exclusion

When I use the term Commercial RDBMS, of course I mean commercially viable, for both parties, as distinct from commercial success for one party. Every version of Windoze is a freak show, a resounding failure for the customer, but it is a commercial success for the supplier.

The enumeration will take time, and I can't write a book for you. Have you googled ? Wiki-ed ? Sure, the internet is chock-full of misinformation, and sure, you have to wade through the posts of Oracle groupies who think it is marvellous, who are blissfully ignorant of the fact that they know nothing else, and thus cannot make a comparison, but they do anyway.

PostgresNonSQL groupies are the same: pseudo-academics who know no commercial RDBMS, but think it their baby that craps itself at five users is absolutely the bees knees.

But if you persevere and wade past all that, you will find some useful info, a few pearls in the acres of pig poop. And you might categorise some of that into "that disqualifies Orable as a Commercial RDBMS".

The alternative is, confirm the status quo in my previous post, which is a consequence of your past behaviour only, and I will write a brochure for you. But that requires swallowing your massive pride.

Note, my charity is such that I did not request an apology, that might choke you to death.

Cheers
Derek Received on Tue Jan 13 2015 - 12:41:00 CET