Re: The Null Problem is a Non-issue

From: Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <910f3e81-d815-4406-8bbc-c62911196206_at_googlegroups.com>


> On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 01:35:13 UTC+10, Derek Asirvadem wrote:

Evidently, I wasn't clear enough for some people.

> What I am trying to avoid, due to the massive amount of time required, and with no resolution at the end, is the kind of "discussion" that took place re the Null Problem, on two separate threads, for example. Here is the statement of facts, *your response to which* will place you clearly in one category or the other.

I meant of course, *your INTERNAL response to which*. Otherwise the "discussion", which I have specifically stated I wish to avoid, ensues. For those of you for whom it is not absolutely clear: * unlike you, I am not committed to self-contradiction. * No, I was not inviting the very discussion that I have stated that I would avoid.

The Null problem has been done, ad infinitum, without resolution, on this forum for decades. That which was resolved three decades ago, remains unresolved in the minds of some.

Cheers
Derek Received on Wed Sep 03 2014 - 03:19:28 CEST

Original text of this message