Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <k94ijt$m8p$1_at_speranza.aioe.org>
sergei.sheinin_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > EAV is a bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea, and if your language has
>> no use beyond dealing with EAV, then it is at best pointless.
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric
>>
>
> My lesson from posting here is that I must do a better presentation
> of a language of higher level in respect to procedural SQL and with
> ability to update programming logic without affecting underlying
> schema.
Wrong. The lesson we're trying to give you is to learn some basics then review the capabilities and shortcomings of existsing products, and then propose better solutions.
Another lesson you should learn is that no one actually _wants_ yet another procedural language.
Thankfully the one thing you haven't mentioned is "object oriented".
Keep it that way.
Art
Received on Wed Nov 28 2012 - 09:39:25 CET