Re: boolean datatype ... wtf?
From: Tony Andrews <tony.andrews.1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1ef48bb5-661a-4fc3-9522-9a4f79791f34_at_26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1ef48bb5-661a-4fc3-9522-9a4f79791f34_at_26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 1, 5:37 pm, Tegiri Nenashi <tegirinena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Two unary relations? CarsWithImmobiliser and CarsWithoutImmobiliser?
> It sounds awkward, but think about it would you ever have any trouble
> when querying such a system (as compared to 3VL with NULL)?
I though that was frowned upon due to POOD? Received on Fri Oct 01 2010 - 18:48:05 CEST