Re: More on identifiers
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:53:04 GMT
Message-ID: <AKlWl.536$tr5.287_at_nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
"Tegiri Nenashi" <TegiriNenashi_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8534e0d3-9d75-48f8-a43f-0c16e576ed85_at_e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 5, 2:25 am, "Walter Mitty" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>
> news:03132046-3fd2-4bb1-9e00-cd81ece451c2_at_h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>Is there anything QM specific about it? Consider 3 coins on the table.
>2 of them have identical states (head-head or tail-tail)
Coins might arguably have accidental features like little nicks and scrapes that could be used for identification purposes. Electrons do not have that kind of feature. I claim that QM state doesn't count as an accidental feature. Received on Sat Jun 06 2009 - 05:53:04 CEST