Re: Objectified Relational Mapping
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:16:07 -0300
Message-ID: <484d9d8d$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> act as
>
>
> what
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> I know Date. Who is the other D? Darwin?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:16:07 -0300
Message-ID: <484d9d8d$0$4076$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Evan Keel wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:484d9325$0$4079$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>
>>Evan Keel wrote: >> >> >>>"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>news:484d88c2$0$4064$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net... >>> >>> >>>>Evan Keel wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>What the hell is objectivied relational mapping? Can anyone point me to >>>>>references? I've Googled, but nothing. My client insists that the db
>
> act as
>
>>>>>an object broker. What does this mean? >>>>>Thanks in advance... >>>>> >>>>>Evan >>>> >>>>Search on CORBA and ORB and ODBMS. >>>> >>>>Why does your client insist on anything so stupid? >>> >>>I just got the email this morning. So before I respond I need to know
>
> what
>
>>>the heck objectivied relational mapping is. Is it really stupid?
>
> Thanks
>
>>>Bob for the Googel search terms.. >> >>It is mostly the impetus for D & D to articulate the Two Great Blunders.
>
> I know Date. Who is the other D? Darwin?
yes, Hugh Darwen
See _The Third Manifesto_
When folks reference D&D around here, they usually mean TTM; even though, the two have collaborated on a lot of other works. Received on Mon Jun 09 2008 - 23:16:07 CEST