Re: Object-relational impedence
From: paul c <toledobysea_at_ac.ooyah>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:45:36 GMT
Message-ID: <AAMAj.63950$w94.63399_at_pd7urf2no>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:45:36 GMT
Message-ID: <AAMAj.63950$w94.63399_at_pd7urf2no>
Marshall wrote:
...
> Well, I dunno. "Scope" is a pretty well-established term. I could pick
> at the anthropomorphism, but I'd just be picking. I'd say it is more
> usual
> to say "nested scope" but it's clear enough to me that's what he means
> with "subscope."
Well, it's not clear to me what living in a scope could possibly mean, except of course for pure mumbo-jumbo. Received on Sun Mar 09 2008 - 08:45:36 CET