Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f7d2580f-02e7-4253-8a46-8676ec560ffb_at_e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f7d2580f-02e7-4253-8a46-8676ec560ffb_at_e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 5, 9:58 am, S Perryman <q..._at_q.com> wrote:
> But you cannot claim that all OO prog langs will have an implementation
> that forces the fallacious "one at a time" scheme
Can you name one that doesn't? (I think I agree that one could exist in theory, however.)
> (Functional programming being a case in point) .
Why are you bringing up functional programming when talking about OOPLs?
Are you thinking of map(), by chance?
Marshall Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 21:02:51 CET