Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:49:47 +0100
Message-ID: <gmo4rvdijeq.xqcacvqmwph3.dlg_at_40tude.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:49:47 +0100
Message-ID: <gmo4rvdijeq.xqcacvqmwph3.dlg_at_40tude.net>
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:22:24 +0000, Eric wrote:
> If you should not use multiple languages, there must be a universal
Yep, it is called a universal/general purpose programming language.
> What is it, is it really universal _right now_, and if not,
> language.
It is, there exist many of them.
The mistake you make is in a wrong presumption that "universal purpose" <=> "best possible."
> when will it be and what should we do in the meantime?
Not to develop pet domain-specific languages if the advantages of those are unclear. If you, say, wanted to create a declarative language based on inference, then that should be a universal purpose one.
-- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.deReceived on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 20:49:47 CET