Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:13:16 -0800
Message-ID: <0osln3dhu1ap7l415uueiit8glivo631bb_at_4ax.com>


JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:

>On Jan 1, 1:47 am, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> Have a nice year Gene, Frank, V.J., Jon, Neo, Troy, Reinier, Doug,
>> Keith, Lynn, rpl, ,Ross, tina, Vladimir, Tegiri, Ed, Alfredo,
>> Joe, Dawn, Bruce, Brian, Ray, Tony(3x), Bob, Rob, Jim, Eric, Roy,
>> Kira, Marshall, Larry, Paul (4x), David (BL, Cressey & Portas), Evan,
>> Cimode, Hugo, Jan, Sybrand & Zorro. It is 2:45 here, just got back
>> from a very nice party.
>
>Well now my hangover is eased, may I wish you a very happy new year
>too, however unimpressed by your collation of Davids as a multi-valued
>attribute. Shame on you mAsterdam ;) Gelukkig nieuwjaar.

     You are confusing a relation with a report.

     Happy New Year, All.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.
Received on Wed Jan 02 2008 - 03:13:16 CET

Original text of this message