Re: One-To-One Relationships

On Nov 30, 2:38 am, paul c <toledobythe..._at_ooyah.ac> wrote:
> JOG wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > There are a load of atoms. Someone else looks at them and says hey its
> > a dead bit of wood, its a 'stump' entity. Someone else considers a
> > bigger picture and says its a snapshot of a 'tree' entity. Me, being
> > lazy, say hey I could sit on that, its a 'seat' entity, etc., ad
> > infinitum.
> > ...
>
> (Not trying to be a smart-ass): By your definition, could the orbits of
> electrons be database entities? Could a number be an entity? Could a
> legal entity that is owned by another legal entity be an entity in the
> same sense as a number could be?

Yup. Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 04:03:54 CET