Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:46:01 GMT
Message-ID: <ZZbWi.165737$1y4.120401_at_pd7urf2no>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:46:01 GMT
Message-ID: <ZZbWi.165737$1y4.120401_at_pd7urf2no>
paul c wrote:
> ... I would rather that smart people (not me, I'm a
> plodder) try to use the RM to address the same problem that AST's try to
> address, rather than trying to address AST's. For me, the former is
> like trying to translate Shakespeare into Latin, ...
I should have said "the latter ...". Serves me right for writing too many sentences. Received on Thu Nov 01 2007 - 04:46:01 CET