Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.

Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12 jul, 22:43, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
>> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >That has nothing to do with the lack of proper definitions, but rather
>> >with the lack of the will to communicate. If both sides are interested
>> >in communicating they will establish a common domain of discourse as
>> >soon as they notice that this is lacking. If both sides are not
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> ITYM "either side is".
>
>The weaker claim seemed to make my point just as well, and I wanted to
>avoid a detracting discussion about whether or not there is a high
>chance of succesful communication if only one is really interested.
>Sometimes you just can't win. :-)

     It was a stronger claim. It takes but one weasel to confuse conmmunication. (Just try reading what some marketroids put out.)

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.