comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 00:55:20 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 01:05:04 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 02:32:02 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 01:06:30 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 01:21:17 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 01:15:29 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 02:29:21 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 02:02:40 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases paul c (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 02:42:27 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 02:25:24 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases Tony_Miller (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:37:40 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases Gene Wirchenko (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:55:45 CEST)
Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 07:47:26 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:47:00 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 19:42:30 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 20:19:43 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 21:05:27 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 21:04:23 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:31:14 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 10:47:16 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:32:28 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 10:53:41 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Keith H Duggar (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 21:44:48 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:37:38 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:53:42 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 19:21:58 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 20:55:42 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Lennart (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:24:19 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:52:05 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Lennart (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 00:16:02 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Marshall (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 16:42:32 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 19:29:28 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 19:57:04 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 22:25:21 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 21:00:45 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 21:51:44 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:46:19 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:53:20 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 08:55:03 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 11:58:17 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases joel garry (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:05:26 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 22:34:04 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:49:54 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 01:23:15 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 12:13:03 CEST)
- Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Jonathan Leffler (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 03:06:55 CEST)
  - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 03:54:06 CEST)
    - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 20:28:09 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 03:15:20 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 06:20:16 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 09:05:25 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:42:56 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 09:02:28 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 09:12:12 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 12:25:52 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 13:39:01 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:45:32 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 13:44:31 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:22:07 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:15:58 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:59:27 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:10:21 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:10:48 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:32:24 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:57:41 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:41:51 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:11:16 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:27:40 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:25:56 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:51:00 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:02:16 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:41:54 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:05:25 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:11:17 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:49:12 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:54:41 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:55:59 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:58:33 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:02:37 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:03:29 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:04:29 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:21:08 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 23:44:00 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:18:03 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:51:24 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:04:18 CEST)
      - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:29:10 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:43:44 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:02:43 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:13:11 CEST)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases rkc (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:28:42 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:26:33 CEST)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:24:25 CEST)
  - Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? DM Unseen (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:27:49 CEST)
    - Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 13:29:47 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:23:20 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:07:05 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:26:58 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:29:11 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:42:08 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:43:28 CEST)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 00:47:22 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:17:10 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:52:38 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:20:00 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:34:54 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:39:31 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 01:42:29 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:03:23 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:06:50 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:23:35 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:38:03 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:53:16 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:15:32 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:19:50 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:42:58 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:02:21 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:29:41 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:36:48 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:37:11 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 05:13:24 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:37:43 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:44:48 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:46:11 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 05:10:37 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:27:05 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:33:51 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:42:16 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:46:32 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 10:17:28 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 13:32:53 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 10:38:29 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 10:50:43 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases EdStevens (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 14:37:58 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 15:12:15 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 16:00:21 CEST)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 17:39:04 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 17:47:35 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 18:00:34 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 18:03:22 CEST)
    - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 23:22:40 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 18:17:42 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 18:46:51 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 19:07:15 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 20:20:34 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 21:00:59 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 21:06:09 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Gene Wirchenko (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 00:32:57 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 00:43:47 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 11:48:27 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 02:51:22 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 11:08:45 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 08:48:08 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 10:02:40 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 18:09:41 CEST)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 00:02:00 CEST)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 02:28:46 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 01:33:44 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 01:50:19 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 02:06:24 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 02:14:10 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 03:30:14 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Vadim Tropashko (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 06:16:00 CEST)
    - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 15:26:20 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 07:45:10 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 08:55:48 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 15:18:02 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 17:10:11 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 21:27:59 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 01:52:15 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 01:57:53 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 05:50:14 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 17:30:32 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 07:04:41 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 16:53:19 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 17:55:03 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 19:10:54 CEST)
- Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? DBMS_Plumber (Sun Jul 08 2007 - 21:00:50 CEST)
  - Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? Sune (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 08:33:41 CEST)
    - Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 19:58:09 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 13:01:00 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 16:22:07 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 15:18:05 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 16:35:36 CEST)
- Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 16:38:07 CEST)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 17:13:31 CEST)
- Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? Gene Wirchenko (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 17:11:42 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 13:56:11 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 14:23:00 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Lennart (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 16:17:35 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jonathan Leffler (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 06:00:22 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 11:03:40 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:15:05 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:39:42 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 16:20:29 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 17:12:45 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 15:55:25 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:30:41 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:54:49 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:21:24 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 20:31:09 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 20:32:29 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 20:55:37 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 21:59:05 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:25:21 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 19:19:58 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:28:13 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 22:03:00 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:34:36 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 21:21:37 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 21:33:50 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:25:10 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 11:10:19 CEST)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 11:28:53 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 22:43:31 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 01:10:26 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 00:19:08 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 01:40:41 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 06:17:24 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:56:57 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 06:31:44 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:46:54 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 14:00:39 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 14:35:55 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:02:06 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:22:05 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:47:21 CEST)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 19:29:33 CEST)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 03:18:19 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 23:46:33 CEST)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 00:31:17 CEST)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 14:45:02 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. DBMS_Plumber (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 08:19:36 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 14:44:26 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 16:54:14 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:56:13 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 18:07:37 CEST)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:09:08 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:30:52 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 23:25:51 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 19:37:42 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 17:56:36 CEST)
- Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value Jonathan Leffler (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 07:25:56 CEST)
  - Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value arthursable_at_myway.com (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 14:06:08 CEST)
    - Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value Jonathan Leffler (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 23:18:29 CEST)
- Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 10:45:22 CEST)
  - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 16:37:28 CEST)
    - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Bob Badour (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 17:32:37 CEST)
    - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 18:24:23 CEST)
      - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 18:52:12 CEST)
        
        Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 19:12:56 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 11:16:28 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. DBMS_Plumber (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 22:41:29 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 00:01:33 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 00:54:14 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 05:03:28 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 00:58:56 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 04:31:45 CEST)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 04:49:07 CEST)
      - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 05:17:31 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 07:36:27 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:51:49 CEST)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 19:12:05 CEST)
      - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 01:44:47 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:52:42 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 09:16:12 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again mAsterdam (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 22:27:53 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 10:10:59 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:57:52 CEST)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 20:59:05 CEST)
      - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 03:48:47 CEST)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 14:45:43 CEST)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:53:54 CEST)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 23:20:54 CEST)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 00:39:49 CEST)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 09:48:31 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 10:14:27 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:15:38 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 01:36:03 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:19:13 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again Lennart (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 21:52:32 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:47:59 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 01:22:53 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 02:14:06 CEST)
  - Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:09:42 CEST)
    - Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 05:28:27 CEST)
      - Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 05:31:41 CEST)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:17:04 CEST)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function TroyK (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 16:38:21 CEST)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function TroyK (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 18:43:12 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:22:28 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 05:28:58 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function Jonathan Leffler (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 05:57:04 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 06:51:31 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:03:21 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:16:18 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:18:33 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Portas (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 08:18:06 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:03:48 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:26:01 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:41:40 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:25:04 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 16:43:15 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 18:03:24 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 16:59:14 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:01:00 CEST)
  - Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 18:04:58 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:08:15 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. joelle.alcock_at_gmail.com (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 02:13:45 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 02:16:34 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:12:54 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:18:27 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:38:15 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 17:54:37 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 19:56:35 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 05:07:49 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 10:23:17 CEST)
- Re: question using aggregate function Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 10:24:56 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 12:56:15 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Nis Jørgensen (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 15:26:55 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 13:23:51 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 13:28:07 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 13:39:06 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 00:53:21 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 13:41:54 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again mAsterdam (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 22:39:25 CEST)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:52:38 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 15:39:02 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 19:23:26 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 19:39:26 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:01:54 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 02:48:53 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Cimode (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 08:35:35 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:28:15 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:27:50 CEST)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 19:47:51 CEST)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 20:20:50 CEST)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 20:30:07 CEST)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 21:56:44 CEST)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Frank Hamersley (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 08:06:08 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:42:42 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 06:47:01 CEST)
  - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 18:38:17 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 07:54:00 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? TroyK (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:08:23 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:10:35 CEST)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:39:34 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 00:23:20 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:35:49 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:53:50 CEST)
- Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model... kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 18:50:54 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 19:09:15 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:24:18 CEST)
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:39:39 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? David Cressey (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:45:27 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? DBMS_Plumber (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 21:04:28 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:53:38 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:57:13 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 22:29:35 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 19:09:54 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 03:31:13 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 03:34:30 CEST)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 22:48:07 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 18:57:37 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:35:37 CEST)
- Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost vldm10 (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 00:13:48 CEST)
  - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 00:30:45 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:41:50 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 10:20:07 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:57:07 CEST)
- Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Bob Badour (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:31:15 CEST)
  - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Nis Jørgensen (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:43:16 CEST)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Marshall (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:34:06 CEST)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:45:37 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:59:25 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:33:14 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:59:16 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:15:23 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:44:26 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:30:17 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 21:37:05 CEST)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:23:59 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 21:38:43 CEST)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 01:22:46 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 16:57:13 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 19:18:42 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 17:28:32 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 18:03:09 CEST)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 18:15:44 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 19:00:19 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 19:39:09 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 22:24:28 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 22:46:00 CEST)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 03:37:25 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 09:27:28 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:27:39 CEST)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 19:48:42 CEST)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 21:32:10 CEST)
- Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Neo (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 23:22:14 CEST)
  - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 01:09:12 CEST)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 01:52:17 CEST)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:32:10 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 00:03:16 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 00:12:27 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 03:32:08 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Gene Wirchenko (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 00:19:25 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 03:32:43 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 00:34:04 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:45:28 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:10:52 CEST)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:01:22 CEST)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:21:24 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Portas (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 02:10:28 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:33:14 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:50:07 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 21:18:09 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:47:37 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:51:34 CEST)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 18:43:13 CEST)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 19:43:44 CEST)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 20:02:11 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 22:00:20 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 22:31:29 CEST)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 22:55:34 CEST)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 23:31:00 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 23:32:19 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:14:32 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:23:35 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:15:23 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:35:11 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:23:13 CEST)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:35:54 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:48:33 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 00:58:53 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 03:13:34 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:39:47 CEST)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Paul (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:58:47 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:46:24 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:33:16 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:47:56 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 17:06:29 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:16:28 CEST)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:28:16 CEST)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Martin T. (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:40:31 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:38:04 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 17:16:04 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:21:01 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 18:56:15 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 19:21:56 CEST)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 20:48:01 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 21:03:02 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 21:58:09 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 22:53:25 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 23:05:48 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 23:24:57 CEST)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 23:10:06 CEST)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 03:36:22 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 03:54:20 CEST)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 05:07:21 CEST)
- Re: data mining of subsets max (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 03:49:20 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 01:06:37 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:10:54 CEST)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 06:13:56 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 12:35:36 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 08:22:27 CEST)
- Re: data mining of subsets Jan Hidders (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 11:44:45 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 17:51:32 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:44:07 CEST)
- Re: How do DBMS handle optimistic locking? Gilles Ganault (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:05:54 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:48:00 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 07:43:49 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 08:25:50 CEST)
- Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 13:13:35 CEST)
  - Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... paul c (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 02:57:45 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 13:18:46 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 13:22:35 CEST)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 13:39:37 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:07:13 CEST)
- Re: Sixth normal form Sameeksha (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:33:51 CEST)
  - Re: Sixth normal form Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 10:41:21 CEST)
    - Re: Sixth normal form Bob Badour (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 14:24:00 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 13:15:28 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 13:38:07 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 13:58:30 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 14:18:23 CEST)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 19:34:29 CEST)
How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 10:15:24 CEST)
- Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:30:05 CEST)
  - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:56:26 CEST)
- Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:15:28 CEST)
  - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:39:02 CEST)
How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 10:27:54 CEST)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:35:31 CEST)
  - Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:38:39 CEST)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? JianC.Xie_at_gmail.com (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:48:29 CEST)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 19:18:02 CEST)

Last message date: Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:55:45 CEST
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:16:34 CEST

44 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]