Re: Naming Conventions?
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 25 Apr 2007 19:25:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1177554347.666413.324590_at_c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 25 Apr 2007 19:25:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1177554347.666413.324590_at_c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 24, 6:39 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 12:17 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Also bad: using the "-info" suffix. *Everything* in the computer is
> > info!
>
> You have a very liberal usage of "info".
Not at all!
> I would say, for example,
> that a thread pool has state but I wouldn't call it info (or data).
Well, my point was not to use "-Info" as a suffix; it appears you
agree, yes?
I would be interested to hear what you consider to be the distinction
between state and data.
Marshall Received on Thu Apr 26 2007 - 04:25:47 CEST
