Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:29:26 GMT
Message-ID: <GVcWh.101602$6m4.6718_at_pd7urf1no>


paul c wrote:
...
> I don't see how a transaction can involve more than one "update". As
> Jim Gray might have said, one can't marry two people at once.
> ...

Sorry, just to try to be clear, I should have said I don't see how a transaction can involve more than one "update" unless SQL is also involved, in which case nearly anything goes, even any mistake that some vendor who pays for the sql committee has made at any time in the past.

p Received on Sat Apr 21 2007 - 02:29:26 CEST

Original text of this message