Re: 1 NF
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:01:30 -0600
Message-ID: <JX3Hh.1942$Gr.1635_at_newsfe21.lga>
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173145036.123078.85500_at_8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 4, 6:58 pm, Gene Wirchenko <g..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 2, 11:07 pm, Gene Wirchenko <g..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> >> "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> >In fact don't worry about answering any of that. No more for me.
>
> >> Thank you. I had decided that I had had enough of your posts
> >> enabling Dawn the Twit. If the above had not been your next post, I
> >> would have plonked you. Dawn does not learn and really, I do not
> >> think she wants to.
<snip>
> Meg Tilly was on the Craig Ferguson Late Late Show last week and she
> said something about how you know you are doing well in poker when the
> men get mean and nasty to you. If they are nice to you, you are
> likely losing. This is the first place I've had a group of men really
> seem to hate me and want me to go away, so her comments triggered a
> light bulb for me. Perhaps some think of this as a competition
> instead of a dialog? Cheers! --dawn
Granted that JOG and Gene may have been unnecessarily unkind, I suggest that their responses may have been at least in part caused by their exasperation in attempting to follow your sometimes rambling and seemingly evasive posts. Developing a more focused and concise style would be to your benefit, and not just in this NG.
Having said that, I must also say that playing the sexism card ill becomes you. :-( Received on Tue Mar 06 2007 - 03:01:30 CET