Re: Navigation question

Walt wrote:

> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1172607243.524217.131930_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>

>>On Feb 27, 8:58 am, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>>news:1172534823.070193.104950_at_k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>Walt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:1172505529.681070.131640_at_q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Feb 26, 8:28 am, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>>news:1172444333.974143.227280_at_q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>>>>>On Feb 23, 10:10 am, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message

[snip]

> The above is interesting, but it has nothing to do with "navigation".
> AFAIK, the phrase "logical navigation" is your own invention. You can coin
> new phrases if you like, but don't ask me, or anyone else in the newsgroup
> to explain what they mean. Correct me if I'm wrong, if the phrtase "logical
> navigation" has been used elsewhere in the literature.

What do you hope to gain by feeding the troll? Received on Wed Feb 28 2007 - 15:21:42 CET