Re: Objects and Relations

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:50:55 GMT, Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:

>JOG wrote:
>
>> On 18 Feb, 19:01, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 18 fév, 19:38, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have learnt a lot from these boards. Some have taught me theory,
>>>>some the ability to express ideas more concisely. Even from others I
>>>>often argue with (such as Dawn) I have learnt common views in business
>>>>that one must expect to encounter, how difficult terminology can be to
>>>>express with clarity, and the care one must take in making
>>>>arguements.
>>>>>From yourself however, Cimode, I have learnt nothing so far. Nada.
>>>
>>>Has it crossed your mind that we did not get a chance to? And if you
>>>learned anything here? what is it exactly that you would not have
>>>better learned by reading a book from DATE or Fabian PASCAL? Out
>>>from what is written on these books, could you establish a list of
>>>items learnt here NOT containing the following words *OO is crap RM
>>>good*, *In this world there are cranks and there are .....blabla *
>>>meaningless crap... Does the world *sterile* thinking evoke anything?
>>>
>>>
>>>>>They are the first to accuse people of intellectual dishonnesty when
>>>>>they display tons of it at every corner...How can such incoherence not
>>>>>hurt RM?
>>>
>>>>Cimode, I really feel you have to get out there more. There is a
>>>>definite lack of social awareness at work, which I sincerely hope you
>>>>can remedy over time.
>>>
>>>I assure you I am fine but thanks for worrying...(I appreciate the
>>>thought ;))
>>>
>>>
>>>>Your claims of "Fraud this", "Fraud that",
>>>>"Marshall is a selfish hypocrit" (!?), etc, etc, ad infinitum, with
>>>>misquotes and changes of context... well it come across to a neutral
>>>>reader as rather embarrassing. J.
>>>
>>>I am sorry for your *neutrality* but I think many people here have a
>>>*right* to respond to people who basically treat people like masterdam
>>>who contradict them as *crank*, *intellectually dishonnest* and all
>>>other *insults*. I believe on the contrary that not only they
>>>should get a response but their incoherences should be exposed so that
>>>an outside participator can make up his mind...
>
>I already exposed their incoherence. The self-aggrandizing ignorants do
>not have the right and do not deserve the privilege to demand my
>resources without limit. Nobody has the right to demand unlimited
>resources of another.
>
>
>> Pointing out mistakes is fine. We all make mistakes. I'm just trying
>> to tell you how /your/ posts comes across imo. Its just a comment,
>> take it or leave it. But perpetuating a chain of insults does seem a
>> bit silly to me.
>>
>>
>>>By their attitude,
>>>these people hurt the little chances RM has to implemented some day,
>>>burried under tons of stereotypical attitudes associated with RM
>>>proponents...
>
>Humans tend toward laziness and complacency. Something has to shock them
>from their revery before they act.

Blimey, seems like school is out again.

I'll come back in a week or so. Maybe there will be some grownups here by then.

Lemming

-- 
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.