Re: OT: Where? and What?
Date: 18 Feb 2007 13:57:30 -0800
Message-ID: <1171835850.747617.218660_at_h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
On 18 fév, 22:10, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
>
> What is good about getting away from anything if you do not clearly
> state what you are aiming at? I guess is this is just a phrasing
> matter, and that you are actually attempting a minimalist approach
> to RM redefinition.
Thank you for the remark and insight. I will do an effort into
rephrasing the subject tomorrow. Somehow, you may be right. In a
sense, I am getting back to the math inspired original RM model in
order to explore some aspects I believe need to be clarified and maybe
some day improved. Among these aspects: relation made domains, inter
relation operations(out of the traditional operation identified). Ex
of questions I am asking myself: What would be a logical optimal way
to equate 2 relations knowing they are totally unordered. (That,
without resorting to tuple level operations but by thinking purelly
algebrically or maybe geometrically).
>I am sure Marshall Spight could say some
> interesting things about this, but I am afraid you have antagonized
> him with insults.
I thougt so too intially. I unfortunately found out that Marshall's
perspective in math suffers major flaws (cf.FEW) which makes almost
impossible for him to think asbtractly without going onto an absurd
path . Besides, some BB brainwashed comments he made has finally made
me loose any interest left in what he says.
Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 22:57:30 CET