Re: Navigation question
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:20:51 GMT
Message-ID: <DkhBh.7183$R71.107643_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> What I found shocking was not the ignorance per se but the fact
> that apparently her cohort is entirely devoid of understanding
> of client/server architecture! Could she have been working exclusively
> in mainframe land? Or SMB apps or something? I am at a loss
> to imagine how the "has never been contested by anyone"
> could happen.
>
>
>
>
> I'll be interested to see how she reacts to the 10^8 / 10^12
> argument. It's indisputably a dealbreaking architecture issue.
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:20:51 GMT
Message-ID: <DkhBh.7183$R71.107643_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Feb 15, 5:42 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Marshall wrote: >> >>>On Feb 15, 4:11 pm, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>Whether working with VSAM files, Pick, or SQL-DBMS's, >>>>this approach has worked and has never been contested by anyone as >>>>being either difficult to maintain or to perform poorly. >> >>In the above, she exposes her own ignorance.
>
> What I found shocking was not the ignorance per se but the fact
> that apparently her cohort is entirely devoid of understanding
> of client/server architecture! Could she have been working exclusively
> in mainframe land? Or SMB apps or something? I am at a loss
> to imagine how the "has never been contested by anyone"
> could happen.
>
>
>
>>Why do you bother with Dawn?
>
> I'll be interested to see how she reacts to the 10^8 / 10^12
> argument. It's indisputably a dealbreaking architecture issue.
I predict she will pretend the argument does not exist or she will actively deny it. Denial is the refuge of those without intellectual honesty. Received on Fri Feb 16 2007 - 13:20:51 CET