Re: Beating up the ORM guys
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:53:35 GMT
Message-ID: <35Ouh.5914$1x.102136_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>>There is critique section now:-)
>>
>>On Jan 27, 6:29 am, Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.t..._at_see.sigblock>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Somebody recently pointed out this article to me:
>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping
>>
>>>Normally I find wikipedia very useful on many things, but this particular
>>>article was startling in its one-sidedness.
>
> That just cheered me up thoroughly. I must add something to it.
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:53:35 GMT
Message-ID: <35Ouh.5914$1x.102136_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
JOG wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 5:46 pm, "Aloha Kakuikanu" <aloha.kakuik..._at_yahoo.com> > wrote: >
>>There is critique section now:-)
>>
>>On Jan 27, 6:29 am, Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.t..._at_see.sigblock>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Somebody recently pointed out this article to me:
>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping
>>
>>>Normally I find wikipedia very useful on many things, but this particular
>>>article was startling in its one-sidedness.
>
> That just cheered me up thoroughly. I must add something to it.
That's odd. When I look at the article page, I do not see the critique section. When I look at the revision history, it is clearly there.
P.S. If you include the self-aggrandizing ignorants' .sig advertisements in your reply, you actively encourage the buggers. Received on Sat Jan 27 2007 - 20:53:35 CET