Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:12:21 GMT
Message-ID: <9a61h.12037$cz.193293_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
> "Honey, I love you, but..."
>
> [Sounds like a line from the Jerry Springer Show, doesn't it?]
>
> Actually, I didn't respond to DW's "nonsense" but to DC's post
> in which he hinted at a practiced technique for delivering product.
> I tried to explain why I don't think going "directly from CDM
> to PDM" is a good idea and that the PDM shouldn't be the final
> work product.
>
> Self-congratulating? No, these ideas aren't mine. Idiot? Maybe so...
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:12:21 GMT
Message-ID: <9a61h.12037$cz.193293_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
J M Davitt wrote:
>> J M Davitt wrote: >> >>> David Cressey wrote: >>> >>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:1161897452.953712.279360_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>>> David Cressey wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:1161893884.428842.156110_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> What a self-congratulating idiot. Do you really have to inflict this >> stuff on us? If you just cannot stop yourself from replying to her >> nonsense, can you not at least snip out the self-congratulatory bullshit?
>
>
> "Honey, I love you, but..."
>
> [Sounds like a line from the Jerry Springer Show, doesn't it?]
>
> Actually, I didn't respond to DW's "nonsense" but to DC's post
> in which he hinted at a practiced technique for delivering product.
> I tried to explain why I don't think going "directly from CDM
> to PDM" is a good idea and that the PDM shouldn't be the final
> work product.
>
> Self-congratulating? No, these ideas aren't mine. Idiot? Maybe so...
Dawn is the self-congratulating idiot. Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 19:12:21 CET