Re: updatableViews
Date: 28 Sep 2006 02:07:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1159434428.473125.278310_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
paul c wrote:
> Rick Elbers wrote:
> > Dear Specialists,
> >
> > I dont hope that this two reactions are symptomatic for the levels in
> > this ng.
> >
> > Op 27 Sep 2006 01:22:59 -0700 schreef "Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com>:
> >
> >> Aloha Kakuikanu wrote:
> >>> Rick Elbers wrote:
> >>>> Dear fellow programmers,
> >>>>
> >>> Oh, man. Judjing from your post history that "somebody" was from
> >>> "comp.object"? You can safely wash away his advice in the toilet.
> >>>
> >>> Seriously, what updatable views problem has to do with topological sort?
> >> Agreed. The interesting fact here is the intuitive perception of
> >> necessity for updateable view.
> >
> > To both posters I would say: nobody forces you to answer questions
> > which you dont understand.
> >
> > Rick
> >
>
> What I don't understand is what malady displays the symptoms you think
> you see. If you're going to throw the term 'updateable views' at a db
> group, I suspect most of them would fail to understand why two tiers are
> material, let alone topological sorts. If you're going to usurp a
> long-standing term to stand for something else, I think you ought to
> justify why. Could it all be just a typo' and you really meant to send
> to some group other than c.d.t?
Well pointed. I believe he is speaking to the wrong audience. Way too far from classical definitions of updateable views.
> p
Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 11:07:08 CEST