Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem

Cimode ha scritto:

> > the contents, instead of providing a *real service*, that is what is
> > likely to happen.
> Been called worse...

You will never hear stupid insults from me. Sorry Chris. I know your nighty best dream is to provoke a woman at the point she would insult you heavily and vulgarly, then she would come back and say I am "sorry" [ueue] , please excuse me, you really got me mad (sniff), please I am sorry. That would be your climax right?

> It seems delusional imagination is your mark of fabric...You are trying
> to stick an etiquette to me to justify that you are not anything but an
> ignorant. You have been busted by most people on this NG..
>

Yes, all your "clones". You had to "invent" some people with your same ideas. Dynosars are not so easy to find and some threads here have an unprobable concentration of them.

 I am asking him to provide a proposal of
> > solution to one of the most common issue I find daily in data
> > management, the one which everyone makes even just 1 report finds
> > immediately out, and he is not able to utter a word of tech advice
> > about it.
>
> > I didn't hear any tech proposal or helpful advice. Just insults: you
> > are a poor ignorant and so on ... It's clear I am ignorant, otherwise I
> > would be here asking questions.

Still no a single tech contribution. And you keep pointing me to the books that you wrote to teach yourseld, and yourself recognize they are not readily understandable.

> Ignorance not only deteriorates your ability to refer to a valuable
> source of knowledge. Ignorance also undermines your ability to ask
> relevant questions. As my time is at least as valuable as yours, I
> dont owe any education. Besides, if you TRULY considered yourself an
> ignorant, you would do something about it like reading some books some
> people pointed out to you instead of taking a defiant arrogant
> attitude...Stop the crap...

If one counts the times you use the word "ignorant" and "delusion", surely gets the idea you have some problem with that words. Who hurt you? The "self aggrandizing" stuff was addressed to you and now you are using it. That's pathetic and gives the idea how much these things hurt. So it's istinctive to you the passing mechanism, instead of asking yourself "why"?
Actually, for a native and a writer, your vocabulary is not that vast, and you keep going about always the same words.

> > I am just wondering whether the problems to which C. knows a solution
> > are only those nobody is asking about.
> >
> > The problem is there on the table, teach us, and show us how a pure
> > theorist solve it, if you can. I challenge you ;)
> I have no time nor I am inclined to spend time for you. You have
> demonstrated nothing but ignorance, arrogance and delusional
> behavior...

Just say "I do not really know. Nor I would be able to devise an algorithm for that".
Ignorance does not imply low intelligence. I know you are a man of great culture. Unfortunately the inverse implication of the previus implication does not hold true.

You have been given a change to show you ingenuity and redeem from prehistoric times.

-P Received on Wed Sep 13 2006 - 23:45:47 CEST