Re: abstraction of table relationships
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:53:16 GMT
Message-ID: <gvVLg.10473$9u.149530_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:53:16 GMT
Message-ID: <gvVLg.10473$9u.149530_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> This person went on to say that it would be a good thing if we
> had some way to abstract these patterns and then refer to
> the abstractions instead of having to repeat the full pattern.
What do you suppose the relational model is? Received on Thu Sep 07 2006 - 15:53:16 CEST