Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:11:14 GMT
Message-ID: <6iJzg.298039$Mn5.198165_at_pd7tw3no>
> that a
>
> How about "the contents of a row stands for a proposition."
> ...
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:11:14 GMT
Message-ID: <6iJzg.298039$Mn5.198165_at_pd7tw3no>
David Cressey wrote:
> "paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message
> news:HN5zg.274778$iF6.97061_at_pd7tw2no...
>> David Cressey wrote: >>> "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message >>> news:1154262656.521112.118530_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >>>> This discussion has illuminated me, and I would like to share that. A >>>> row is of course merely a proposition, >>> >>> A small but important (IMO) correction: >>> >>> A row contains a proposition. That's not quite equivalent to saying
> that a
>>> row is a proposition. >>> >>> >> Or a row stands for a proposition?
>
> How about "the contents of a row stands for a proposition."
> ...
I don't know, heh, one reason being that I don't know how to write down a row that has no 'contents' (I believe Brian S might think he does, though!).
p Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 16:11:14 CEST